Thank you for visiting this site.  It is currently under construction.  Please continue to visit the site as its topics are developed. 

 

In the meantime, please visit these related sites:

 

www.pbwmodel.com  www.randall-cv.net  www.charlotte-johnson.net  www.randall-legal.net

www.bible-math.net  www.pbw-boutique.net  www.sacred-feminine-class.net

 

 

Introduction

 

           The purpose of this web site is to engender academic debate concerning the Church’s possession of the deciphered translation of scripture’s encrypted social choice theory model and the consequences wrought by such possession throughout history.  First, certain hypotheses and their respective proofs adduce sufficient analytical evidence supporting a conclusion scripture is an encrypted social choice theory model and does not involve reports of historical fact.  Second, in the face of such supported hypotheses, questions arise:  Does a deciphered translation of scripture’s encrypted social choice theory model exist?  If so, who has it?  The answers to these questions are (i) yes, and (ii) the Church.  Historical facts and events point to the latter conclusion.  The following is a summary of the hypotheses, proofs and allegations that shape this web site’s studies, investigations and arguments, to wit:

 

Hypothesis:  Scripture is an encrypted social choice theory model and does not involve reports of historical fact.

 

Proof:  There is sufficient analytical evidence showing the Numbers Chapters 1, 2 and 26 Twelve Tribe Position and Census Change Explanations are model driven and do not involve reports of historical fact.  There is sufficient analytical evidence the Ezra Ch. 2 and Nehemiah Ch. 7 numerical references are model driven and do not involve reports of historical fact.  Ergo, scripture is an encrypted social choice theory model and does not involve reports of historical fact.

 

Hypothesis:  Pythagoras or the Pythagoras School authored the original scripture social choice theory model encryption scheme.

 

Proof:  There is sufficient analytical evidence showing (i) Pythagoras or the Pythagoras School is credited with the discovery of irrational numbers; (ii) Pythagoras or the Pythagoras School discerned philosophical content in numerical references and numerical progressions; (iii) scripture’s social choice theory model excludes irrational numbers as inherently infinite and confounded, and (iv) scripture’s numerical references are inherently philosophical content imprested.  Ergo, the analytical evidence supports a conclusion Pythagoras or the Pythagoras School authored the original scripture social choice theory model encryption scheme.

 

 

Allegations Concerning the Church’s Possession of the Deciphered Translation of Scripture’s Social Choice Theory Model

 

Based on the foregoing supported hypotheses, several significant allegations concerning the Church and its possession of the deciphered translation of scripture’s encrypted social choice theory model necessarily emerge.  The following allegations require study and investigation in the face of the analytical evidence adduced to support the foregoing hypotheses.  Allegations involving the Church’s possession of the deciphered translation of scripture’s encrypted social choice theory model include:

 

           1. The Church is in possession of the deciphered translation of scripture’s social choice theory model.

           2. The first Pope of the Church, Peter, was not the physical manifestation of the Apostle Peter described in the New Testament and, therefore, any characterization of the first Pope of the Church as being the Apostle Peter is a misrepresentation proffered to obscure the realization scripture is an encrypted social choice theory model.  The Apostle Peter described in the New Testament is among the metaphors used to describe the operation of scripture’s encrypted social choice theory model and reports about the Apostle Peter, or any other apostle, do not involve reports of persons in fact.

           3. The Church entered into an agreement with Constantine to induce Constantine to proclaim Christianity the religion of the Roman Empire.  In consideration for the religious power and control bestowed upon the Church by Constantine, the Church agreed to use scripture’s mythology as a means for placating and controlling the hoi polloi such that the hoi polloi would not revolt against the Roman Empire when it received a disproportionate distribution in the scarce allocation of resources.  The phenomena of using scripture as a means to placate and control the hoi polloi in the struggle over the allocation of scarce resources is hereinafter referred to as the “Constantine Principle.”

           4. The Church took several measures throughout history to forestall the distribution of scripture so as to further forestall the discovery scripture is an encrypted social choice theory model and does not involve reports of historical fact.

           5. Throughout history, the Church disclosed certain aspects of scripture to create the appearance that certain quantitative principles were “discovered” when, in fact, they were explicit in the deciphered translation of scripture’s social choice theory model.

           6. Around the middle of the nineteenth century, the  Church recognized the transition from the agrarian economy into the industrial economy was coming of age in the most powerful nations on earth.  The struggle the transition wrought was manifest in the American civil war.  The struggle captured the conflict between the agrarian economy’s decentralized control over the allocation of capital and the coming industrial economy’s centralized control over the allocation of capital.  Recognizing its need to reassert its power among the world’s coming industrial nations and the heightened role the Constantine Principle would play in industrial economies, the Church invested sufficient, but not complete, disclosures in heads of state around the world that scripture involved an encrypted social choice theory model authored by Judaism’s forbearers and did not involve reports of historical fact.  Responses to the Church’s partial disclosure throughout the ensuing decades include regimes that proscribed organized religion; regimes that persecuted Judaism; and regimes that came to reject the Constantine Principle, while other regimes continue to subscribe to the Constantine Principle. 

           7. Vatican II represents the Church’s recognition of the industrial economy’s transition into the information economy.  However, Vatican II did not bring any publicly available disclosures regarding the Church’s possession of the translation key of scripture’s encrypted social choice theory model.

 

 

United States of America Involvement

 

           It appears the United States responded to the Church’s alleged middle of the nineteenth century partial disclosure of scripture’s deciphered social choice theory model by directly or indirectly supporting “think tanks” endowed with a mission to completely decipher the model.  The United States of America ranks among those regimes that continue to subscribe to the Constantine Principle, which now underscores its involvement in conflict in many areas throughout the world.

           It is alleged that the common thread among the assassinations of Presidents Abraham Lincoln, James Garfield and John F. Kennedy and Robert F. Kennedy and Martin Luther King, Jr. is that all were vested with the knowledge of the Church’s mid-nineteenth century disclosure and intended to unveil the disclosure to the hoi polloi.  As a result, they were assassinated to preclude the disclosure and to protect the value of the Constantine Principle to certain informal cartels.  It is further alleged the political elite in the United States remain vested with the knowledge of the Church’s mid-nineteenth century disclosure that scripture is an encrypted social choice theory model and not a report of historical fact and continue to take steps to protect the Constantine Principle by maintaining secrecy over the Church’s disclosure in exchange for furthering their political enrichment.

Contact Data

 

                  D. Randall Jenkins, Ph.D.

                  5672 East Circulo Terra

                  Tucson, Arizona 85750-1004

 

                  Telephone:  (520) 544-0472

 

                  Facsimile:  (520) 544-0472 (Ask for Facsimile Tone)

 

                  E-mail Address:  Randall@PBWModel.Com